Thursday, December 1, 2011

It Is Never Right To Kill/It Is Sometimes Right To Kill

Is killing right or not? Nobody can be absolutely sure about that since all of us have different opinions on this matter. But in my opinion, I think it is never right to kill and I have several reasons for this.

Firstly, all living things were created by something or someone, whom most of us refer to as God, and we are able to reproduce and give birth to new life because of that someone. That is why we do not have the right to destroy, when we do not have the power to create.

Secondly, for example, if there was a murderer who killed this particular victim, his family and friends would most probably be furious at the culprit. Then when the authorities catch him, they would want him executed out of revenge. After that, the relatives of the murderer might get angry as well and it would become an endless cycle of killing and hatred. Furthermore, by killing the person who murdered one of their important family members, they are doing the same thing as the murderer did and so both sides will be at the wrong.

In addition, life is precious, no matter how small it is, and all living things only have one chance to live. If you kill someone, he/she will lose his/her potential and possibilities in the future. Once we die, it’s all gone. That is another reason why I think it is never right to kill.

Some people may argue that killing is sometimes right. Now look at this example. If one is being attacked by a murderer, he has the right to defend himself, but if he kills the attacker due to the fact that his own life was in danger, both are at the wrong. The attacker because he was the one who tried to murder the other person in the first place, and the “victim” because he had no choice but to kill the murderer to save his own life. We can sympathise with the “victim’s” decision but unfortunately he is at the wrong as well since in the end he still killed the attacker. As I said in the previous paragraph, life is precious, and thus even if someone didn’t mean for it to happen, it will still be considered a punishable crime.

In conclusion, I think killing is never the right thing to do and big fights such as Wars are even more pointless. People are sacrificed over mere pieces of land most of the time. I hope these kinds of aimless massacre won’t happen anymore in the near future and the world to be at peace.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Targets For My Presentation

1. Shorten my Presentation.
2. Slow down the text for slow readers.
3. Make the fonts bigger.
4. Analyse the lyrics in more detail - for example, why did John Lennon use so much repetition in the song "Power To The People"?

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Opening of 127 Hours

At the start, it shows a lot of people cheering, clapping and swimming which include the use of our arms. That gives us a hint that something is definitely going to happen to the lead role's arm(s). Later when it shows his house, there is a close up shot of his phone, which tells us that something related to communication is going to occur. As we watch him packing his things eagerly for his adventuring that day, we notice that he is just grabbing things at random and unconsciously leaving all the important gears such as an army knife and extra bottle of water behind.

Oh his way to the canyon, there is a sign that says the closest civilisation is 100 miles away from where he is, thus shows how far away he has travelled from the city. Furthermore, when he was driving he passed by several bikers on a road and when they passed by each other, he realises that there is a biker who looks similar to him. This is another clue which tells us that something concerning a bike is going to happen to him.

There were several camera angles, e.g. over shoulder, medium, close up, extreme close up, bird's eye view, etc. The bird's eye view shot was used when showing the heavy traffic so as to give a big picture of how busy the whole city was; whereas the close up shot was used when the main character was driving his car in order for the audience can see his expressions clearly. The videos were edited into triptychs so as to show the audience more things and details.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

STUCK

“127 Hours” is a fantastic survival film directed by Danny Boyle, the same person who got the Best Director Award 2009 for the movie, “Slumdog Millionaire”.

The film is based on the true story of Aron Ralston, an adventurer who got his arm stuck under a boulder in the middle of nowhere during one of his canyoneering and tries to figure out a way to get himself out of there. What’s going to happen to him? Watch the movie to find out!

In my opinion, this movie was excellent and here are some points that I liked about it: the use of camera angles (e.g. taking a worm’s eye view shot of Aron when he was having a good time canyoneering and taking a bird’s eye view shot when he got his arm stuck under the boulder), the opening of the movie (e.g. it showed a few clips of people doing something with their arms and this gives the audience an idea that something related to arms is going to happen), the dramatic music and sound effects throughout the movie (e.g. the catchy music at the opening of the movie which attracts the audience’s attention), etc. There was nothing I disliked about this movie, maybe except for Aron’s swearing.

The actors in the movie were excellent and I found the characters interesting and fun to watch. I liked how Aron was carefree and energetic but on the other hand, I didn’t like how he always went somewhere without telling anyone about it. Still, I think most of the audience watching the movie will like him instantly because of his cheerful nature. His actor has portrayed his character very well.

Overall, I think this was one of the best survival films I have ever watched and I strongly encourage you to watch it as well. Thank you very much for reading this film review.








Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Homework?

Where is the analysis of the opening of 127 Hours and the image that sums up the feeling it portrays to you?
Please complete all work set - ask if you are not sure.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Film Review Success Criteria

The different SC's are:

Film Review Guide SCs
1. To be able to follow the instructions of the film review guide to write a good and detailed review.
2. To be able to put in my own thoughts about the film in my review and persuade other people to watch it if it was good.

AFs
1. To be able to organise my writing in a suitable way (in this case, organising my review into several paragraphs).
2. To be able to write texts to suit a variety of different purposes (in this case, a film review).

Personal
1. To be able to write a good and detailed film review without much difficulties.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Monday, September 19, 2011

Key Competencies


Today during our English lesson, we learnt about the Nexus Key Competencies. 


Here are 3 of the KCs:

1. Communicating & Interacting with ICT
2. Self Management
3. Participating and Contributing

I think I am fairly good at communicating and interacting with ICT as well as participating and contributing, but I would like to improve on my self management by finishing my classwork in the limited amount of time and completing my homework before their respective dead lines. 




THINK-PAIR-SHARE


How are these words (below) connected to the Key Competencies?

1. Independence
2. Life
3. Transferable
4. Relationships
5. Team

These words can be grouped into the groups in the Nexus Key Competencies. 

The Learner: Independence.
The Learner's World: Relationships and Team.
The Wider World: Life and Transferable.

I grouped them in this way because: the learner learns how to be independent when doing individual classwork; relationships between friends happen around the learner's world, and teamwork involves the people around them as well; the wider world involves various things about life; transfers of all kinds involve the people all around the world.


Look at the LR below from Joe. What positive and negative features can you identify in terms of the reflection being a tool for learning?

Positive: He knows what he has learnt.
Negative: He lacks details and is only giving a rough idea of his learning. 


Now, look at the LR below from Hafiz. What positive and negative features can you identify in terms of the reflection being a tool for learning? How does this compare with Joe's reflection?


Positive: He gave lots of detail and explains clearly what he has learnt and how.
Negative: He shouldn't stick to writing long sentences all the time; he should add different types of sentences in as well. 


Joe's reflection is really short and he doesn't explain what he has learnt and how. He has only attempted to answer each question roughly and didn't extend it further. On the other hand, Hafiz's one contains a lot of detail and has explained clearly everything that he's learnt. He has done a better job than Joe. But one thing he can improve is that he needs to add more sentence types to his piece of writing. Most of them are long sentences and I don't see much variations. 


From comparing these two reflections, what would you say are the features of a valuable LR that can move your learning forward? Aim to note at least four positive & two negative features.


Positive:
1. Good amount of detail.
2. Good vocabulary.
3. Describing your feelings when writing about something you found difficult to learn or achieve.
4. Correct spelling and accurate use of grammar. 


Negative:
1. Don't add excessive information in your reflection.
2. Don't stick to writing one type of sentence only; add more variations.



Summarise today's lesson in 3 words only.

Learnt to Reflect.

Saturday, September 17, 2011

My Learning Journal

In English lessons so far, I have learnt how to write summaries, organise work, work as a team, use my human ingenuity and think up of creative solutions to various situations, writing instructions, plot devices, etc. During this process, I have also learnt how to use RAF 1 (skim, scan and detailed reading), RAF 2 (retrieve information and ideas from text), RAF 5 (explain and comment on writer's use of language), WAF 1 (write imaginative, interesting and thoughtful texts), WAF 2 (produce text which suit task, reader and purpose), WAF 3 (organise and present whole texts effectively), WAF 6 (write with technical accuracy of grammar and punctuation), WAF 7 (use appropriate and effective vocabulary) and WAF 8 (using correct spelling).

I think I did fairly well when using these AFs:
1. RAF 1 - during English classes we had to read through various different types of texts and use those techniques in different situations. For example, when I was looking for a certain word in a long paragraph, I used the "skimming" technique and found it without much difficulties.
2. WAF 1- we were told to write a summary of our own survival stories we had in mind, thus this involves creativity and imagination. A story idea immediately surfaced in my mind and I summarised it as much as I could, and ended up with one paragraph. When the teacher checked it, she said I had done a good job, so I guess I have accomplished this AF pretty well.
3.WAF 2 & 3 - we were told to produced different kinds of text over our recent English lessons, e.g. summary writing, instructional writing, etc. I was able to do so without any problems, so I think I had done well using these AFs.
4. WAF 6, 7 & 8 - these are essential for all kinds of text, and I was able to use all of them correctly in the majority of the writings we did recently.

On the other hand, I think I can work on improving these AFs:
1. RAF 2 - when I read a text, I always pick out the unnecessary information along with the important ones, so I need to learn to leave out the extra bits and pieces.
2. RAF 5 - after we finished writing an instructional writing each, we exchanged them with a partner and let them check the language we used; I wasn't very sure which ones were appropriate to use and which weren't, so I'd like to improve my knowledge about correct uses of language in certain types of texts.

Recently in our English lessons, we were watching a movie called "Cast Away" as to give us a whole idea of what a survival film was like. I found out that these types of films were popular because human beings have the will to survive even in a devastating situation, and it's interesting to watch how they persevere and overcome the difficulties in the end. I also learnt that the use of symbols in any type of movie is very essential as they usually tell someone whether something is important or not and how they should be handled. An example of this in "Cast Away" was the wings on the parcel which ended up on the same island the main character, Chuck Noland, was stranded on. There were other parcels which had drifted onto the island as well and Chuck made use of the contents inside them, but he did not open up the one with the wings. That's because the symbol shows that the parcel is a very important one, and during the time he was desperately trying to survive all by his own on the uninhabited island, the thought of delivering the parcel to its owner kept his will from shattering into pieces.

There is another important device that kept the movie enjoyable, and that is Chuck's "best friend" when he was on the island, the volley ball "wilson". He found "him" in a parcel and used his own blood to draw a face on it. Since then, he felt like he had made a companion and talked to wilson about all his thoughts and problems he had about the island. Even though "he" had never replied to any of Chuck's words, "he" still kept him from going insane out of absolute loneliness. It was interesting but sad at the same time, watching a drama between a human and a non-living thing. I think this was one of the key points which made the film unique.

After watching the movie, we will start filming our own survival films. The idea I have in mind is somewhat similar to "Cast Away", but then the main character (which will be me) will get stranded on an island in a completely different fashion. It will go something like this: I was in a hot spring enjoying my time when I suddenly got sucked in to the ground and somehow got stranded on an uninhabited island! From there, I will slowly learn to adapt to the harsh wilderness and find out a way to escape from that place.

How's that for a story? I'm still not sure what details to put in, but that's roughly the whole idea. I am looking forward to writing scripts and filming the movie soon!